Some gossip

Maybe it sounds shortsighted and superficial, but the very part of Chinese law which I strongly opposed with is a small one---in a car accident, all the obligation leaves to the driver. For a country of such large population, there can be tons of car accidents a day. Also, drivers appear to be nothing compare to the quantity of pedestrians. Although it seems to obey the principle of minority follows majority, it is hard to say that this is a rational law. I walked to school when I was still a middle school student, every day I saw my classmates cross the street when the light is red. Even well educated teenagers disobey the rules, how about the vast insufficient educated adults due to the Cultural Revolution in the 1960s? Maybe you will say that the teenagers are just playful, but it is nonsense that playing against the rule is interesting to them. As so many pedestrians don’t obey the traffic rules, how come the driver is always responsible for the accident? Discovering the leak of it, some people cause an accident on purpose to get indemnity. The law violates its purpose, making the roads more chaotic. I don’t know if it is altered now, but it has been an unreasonable existence.